
Galton and Differential Psychology
|
|
Galton also reviewed accounts contrasting the taciturn reserve of American
Indians with
the talkative impulsivity of Africans. He noted that these temperamental differences persisted regardless of climate
(from the frozen north through the equator), religion,
language, or political system (whether self-ruled or governed by the Spanish, Portuguese, English, or French).
Anticipating later work on transracial adoption, Galton
pointed out that the majority of individuals adhered to
their racial type, even if they were raised by white
settlers.
Based on his readings and his personal
experiences of exploring Southwest Africa, Galton concluded
that the average mental ability of Africans was low, whether they
were observed in Africa or in the Americas. In Descent,
Darwin acknowledged Galton's work and also accepted the
importance of the brain-size differences reported between
Africans and Europeans by Paul Broca and other nineteenth-
century scientists.
Modern studies confirm Darwin and
Galton. The races do differ in average brain size and
intelligence. The racial gradient in average intelligence
and brain size increases from Africans to Europeans to East
Asians.
Although Darwinians
emerged victorious
among the educated classes in their nineteenth-century battles
against Biblical theology, subsequently they lost that ground
to egalitarians, Marxists, cultural-relativists, and
postmodernists. From Herbert Spencer (1851) to the world
depressions of the late 1920s and 1930s, while the political
right was ascendant, the political left came to believe,
perhaps correctly, that "survival of the fittest" was
incompatible with social equality.
rushton@charlesdarwinresearch.org
redhead@charlesdarwinresearch.org
Back to the Top
Back to CDRI Home Page